Condominium Car Park Entry: RFID Tag, Card or Number Plate.

REFERENCEIN-19
TERRITORYEVERY LAYER, ONE CONTRACTOR
ISSUED
EXTENT1,499 WORDS
READING7 MIN
DRAWN BYOCCHIO TEC SDN BHD

QUESTION ANSWEREDThe building is being quoted for car park entry: a long-range tag, a card or number plate recognition. Which one should a committee choose, and on what grounds?

IN SHORT

Choose a condominium car park entry system by what the building must enforce. The strata by-laws let management deactivate a card, tag or transponder it issued, suspend a defaulter’s car park bay, and, where a vehicle’s alarm is a frequent nuisance, bar that vehicle from entering. The barrier is a separate machine: part of every layer, one contractor.

A car park entrance drawn in elevation: a boom barrier with its arm across the lane, a long-range reader on a post above it, a camera on the wall at plate height, and two induction loops set into the deck.
Reader, camera, loops and armR-01
KEY TAKEAWAYSR-02
  • 01By-law 6(4) deactivates a “card, tag or transponder” issued to a defaulterCREDENTIAL
  • 02By-law 25(7) bars a nuisance-alarm vehicle, not a cardVEHICLE
  • 03MCMC SRSP-530: RFID at 919–923 MHz; above 2 W ERP needs an apparatus assignmentREADER
  • 04Plate recognition works only inside the limits its software declaresCAMERA
§01

What actually decides a condominium car park entry system?

The powers that reach the car park decide it, and the Third Schedule to Malaysia’s Strata Management (Maintenance and Management) Regulations 2015 writes each against a different object: a credential (by-law 6(4)), a designated bay on the common property (6(5)), and a vehicle whose alarm is a nuisance (25(7)).

By-law 6(5) lets management suspend a defaulter from “any car park bay in the common property that has been designated” for him. By-law 25(7), where a vehicle alarm becomes a frequent nuisance, lets it “prohibit the vehicle from entering the development area” — a power over that vehicle, not over a card.

§02

What does each method identify, and what can it never tell you?

Each access control method at the lane identifies one thing: a long-range tag, an access card or a number plate. None identifies the driver, and only plate recognition leaves a record against the vehicle. The powers are not exclusive, so a hybrid is legitimate: a tag can carry the credential 6(4) reaches while a plate supplies the vehicle record. A building wanting both should say so in the tender.

WHAT THE LANE ACTUALLY IDENTIFIESR-03
MethodIdentifiesCannot tell youBy-law power it supports
Long-range tag on the vehicleThe tag, hands-freeWho is driving, or whether the tag is on its own car6(4)
Card at the laneThe card, once the driver reaches outWhich vehicle came in6(4)
Number plate recognitionThe plate, inside the software’s limitsWho is driving; a plate the software cannot support—

A third party’s toll tag is the case to settle in writing: a Touch ’n Go RFID tag is “affixed to either the windscreen or the headlamp of the vehicle” and “only one tag can be registered and installed on a single vehicle”. By-law 6(4) speaks of a device “issued to a defaulter”, so ask who can cancel it — unlike the card the building issues, whose failure modes are in an access card not working.

§03

What do Malaysia’s radio rules put on a long-range reader?

Malaysia’s radio rules put a band, a power ceiling and an authorisation route on a long-range reader. MCMC’s Standard Radio System Plan SRSP-530, dated 31 October 2005, covers the “utilisation of the frequency band 919 – 923 MHz for Radio Frequency Identification Device” systems, and fixes both the power limit and which readers need an application.

Clause 5.5 says “the total maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of the interrogator equipment shall not exceed 4 Watts”. Clause 6.1 splits the authorisation: below 2 W ERP is “by way of Class Assignment”, which “does not require any application to be made to MCMC”; up to 4 W needs an apparatus assignment; above 4 W “is not permitted”.

IPSEC states its “RFID Frequency is approved by SIRIM (UHF 919 Mhz to 923 Mhz)”, but the band is the easy half: the plan caps power, not read distance, so a quoted range in metres is the supplier’s own claim. Band, ERP and route belong in the scope of works.

§04

What can number plate recognition not read?

Number plate recognition cannot read outside the limits its own software declares: the plate types it supports, the camera mounting angle it allows, and the minimum pixels it needs across a plate. The software supplier sets all three, not the camera.

Published accuracy carries none of those conditions: Times Parking advertises “99% car plate recognition accuracy”. Bosch Security Systems’ own ANPR white paper warns that “many ANPR suppliers can handle only retroflective license plates”, that a camera must “respect the maximum camera mounting angle” specified by the software supplier because the software “will not work reliably beyond these limits”, and that “the minimum pixel values can differ per country”.

That does not make it the wrong choice. It makes two things answerable first: which plate types, positions and sizes the software supports, and what happens to the car it cannot read. A plate held against a unit is also a record about a person — see what a JMB may release.

§05

What must the barrier itself do, whichever method you choose?

The barrier is a separate machine from whatever reads the credential, and its job is the same whichever method you choose: clear the queue, refuse to close on a car, and open on an emergency signal. Its times, duty cycle, safety beam and emergency wiring are specified and witnessed separately.

The safety light barrier is a test, not a claim: an object in the light path must make the receiver’s yellow LED go out and the arm must not close. Emergency opening is wiring — a “fire-fighter switch, emergency opening contacts, etc.” on an Open high priority input, and “while the signal is present, the barrier cannot be closed”. Uniform Building By-Laws 1984 by-law 140 requires an access way “accessible to fire brigade appliances” but says nothing about barriers: draw and witness it.

Induction loops are civil work, cut and tested in the deck. The arm is for vehicles — “the barriers are not approved for pedestrian traffic, bicycles or animals” — so the pedestrian gate is a separate decision on the same head end.

§06

What should the committee ask for before it chooses?

Before it chooses, a committee should require six things in writing: what each reader transmits and under whose authorisation, what the ANPR software declares it can read, who controls the credential, the drawings, the emergency opening arrangement, and the tests due at handover and each service.

WHAT TO REQUIRE IN WRITINGR-04
  • N01Each reader’s band, ERP and authorisation routeSTATED
  • N02Plate types, positions, angle and pixels the ANPR software declaresSTATED
  • N03Who issues, cancels and reactivates the credentialESTABLISHED
  • N04Loop positions, camera mounting and containment, drawnDRAWN
  • N05The emergency opening arrangement, and who tests itWITNESSED
  • N06Safety beam and loop tests at handover and each serviceSCHEDULED

N01 to N04 belong in the tender — see how to write a scope of works — N05 and N06 in a maintenance contract. Three quotations describing three different jobs make comparing tenders fairly harder; if the guardhouse still takes visitors, see what it may collect.

Occhio Tec is an Extra Low Voltage contractor established in 2010: CCTV, access control and video intercom, mainly in Kuala Lumpur condominiums in Mont Kiara, Bangsar and KLCC, a MicroEngine Authorised System Installer since 2014, and it takes over systems another contractor installed. A lane is a site question: request a site survey, or WhatsApp +60 11-6494 4931.

F-A

Questions committees ask about car park entry

Q-01Can we deactivate a resident’s car park tag when they are in arrears?

By-law 6(4) of the Third Schedule to the 2015 Regulations allows management to “deactivate any electromagnetic access device such as a card, tag or transponder, issued to a defaulter” after the fourteen days in by-law 6(1)(a), and a charge “not exceeding ringgit fifty” to reactivate it.

Q-02Do we need MCMC approval for a long-range reader at our gate?

It depends on its power. Under MCMC SRSP-530 an interrogator below 2 W ERP is authorised “by way of Class Assignment”, which “does not require any application to be made to MCMC”. Up to 4 W needs an apparatus assignment; above 4 W is not permitted.

Q-03If the barrier reads tags by itself, do we still need the guardhouse?

Automating residents does not automate everyone else. A visitor or a delivery van has no tag, and a vehicle barrier is not a pedestrian gate: “the barriers are not approved for pedestrian traffic, bicycles or animals”. Barring a nuisance-alarm vehicle under by-law 25(7) needs someone to act.